As the Scottish biblical scholar Alexander Souter expressed it, they gathered up in themselves all that was most valuable in the work of their predecessors. We dare not and must not ignore these things. The Alexandrian text-type, exemplified in the Codex Ephraemi, exhibits a polished Greek style. Thus, Vaticanus and Sinaiticus, leading representatives of the Alexandrian family of manuscripts, are in such great condition because they are full of errors, alterations, additions, and deletions so they would have had little chance of wear and tear, never having been used by true believers. All modern Bibles of the day have therefore not been translated from the 5000+ Majority text, but from the 5 disagreeing witnesses. [9] It was followed by an Introduction and Appendix by Hort appearing in a second volume in 1882. Patristic Quotations of the New Testament, Part 2 The Flood to the Deliverance From Egypt, Part 3-Deliverance From Egypt to Israels First King, Part 4 Israels First King to Captivity in Babylon, Part 5-Captivity in Babylon to the Completion of the Book of Malachi, Part 6-From Malachi to the Birth of Jesus, Part 8-Jesus Resurrection to death of the Apostle John. Drs. Thus, the fact that B and ALEPH are so old is a point against them, not something in their favour. To understand Westcott and Hort, you must first understand textual criticism. Murdock Translation of the Western Peshitto. Since WH, further discoveries and knowledge have meant the eclectic text we have now is even more accurate than back then. Tobin Pederson, When it comes to the various Bible versions of our modern day, most readers assume that all Bibles are created equal, with perhaps differing degrees of readability. List Of Bible Trivia Questions And Answers. They are not aware nor concerned that almost all the modern Bible versions of our day are built upon the Greek Text of Westcott and Hort, commonly called the Westcott-Hort text. 68 days ago. Westcott and Hort ExposedFROM THEIR OWN MOUTHS! Only the Western and the Alexandrian family texts existed in the third and fourth centuries and only the Alexandrian in the second century. This Greek NT was the basis for the Revised Version of that same year. [13], The New Testament in the original Greek (1881), The New Testament in the original Greek Introduction and Appendix (1882), Comparison of the Wescott/Hort text with other manuscript editions, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Westcott_and_Hort&oldid=1137236913, This page was last edited on 3 February 2023, at 15:13. Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia,Novum Testamentum Graece27th Edition, United Bible Societies 4th Edition. [5] In this they followed one of the primary principles of their fledgling textual criticism, lectio brevior, sometimes taken to an extreme, as in the theory of Western non-interpolations, which has since been rejected. If we investigated the translators of the KJV we may be surprised at what we would find. What New Testament Textual Studies Sources Do We Have? Almost all the websites, articles, films, videos and messages I have come across regarding the KJV, pay no attention at all to this viewpoint as they. The following brief comments are not meant to stand alone, please use the links that follow that will enlarge, reinforce, and add to the article. 44262. It follows the edition ofSeligman Baerexcept for the books of Exodus to Deuteronomy, which never appeared in Baers edition. If we were to hand-copy the same manuscript a thousand times, obvious errors probably would be corrected in many copies, but new errors would be introduced, many of them probably the result of a well-intended correction. A textual criticism principle that has been derived from this observation is that manuscripts should be weighed (i.e. There are various groupings of texts, according to this thinking, and one of them is of mainly later texts after the fall of Antioch and Alexandria to Islam. In Matthew 24:35 Jesus said, Heaven and earth shall pass away but My words shall not pass away. Isaiah 40:8 says, The grass withereth, the flower fadeth: but the Word of our God shall stand forever. See also Is. I would venture to say that every King James Version Onlyist doctrinally believes differently than the other. (13) What do you do with the fact that the KJV has 1,000 different words that do not mean today what they meant in 1611, even having the opposite meaning? Westcott and the Ghostly Guild. First, many of the papyrus Alexandrian manuscripts are in terrible shape, some being 200 years older than codicesVaticanus and Sinaiticus, which would mean that they must have been read very often by true believers. (not fools for Christ, just fools!) The judge then listens to the other side which holds over 5000 witnesses. Westcott and Hort - Wikipedia Further, if we cannot demonstrate the Trinity without this one verse we need to learn to be better Bible students. Again, they need not pull quotes from when Westcott and Hort were young men but rather show one unorthodox belief in their commentaries, which have been listed below. (2.22-23), The reading is less likely to be original that combines the appearance of an improvement in the sense with the absence of its reality; the scribal alteration will have an apparent excellence, while the original will have the highest real excellence. God has promised to preserve His Word among us, and God always keeps His promises! http://www.kjvonly.org/doug/index_doug.html, A superb debate between two Bible teachers one defending the KJV chaired by Doug Harris, founder of Reachout, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwe_nxeVwE0. Together, they produced The New Testament in the Original Greek, one of the earliest examples of modern textual criticism. They are anything but. For centuries, manuscripts were preserved, even when the Catholic priests could no longer understand them. Instead of simply translating what the majority of witnesses agree to, they translate from their own fancy, the false witness of the five. Shows (by color coding and word notes) grammatical details within the Greek language. The same would be true of Codex Vaticanus as well. If you have any questions, please review our Privacy Policy or email us at privacy@biblegateway.com. Box 610368, Port Huron, MI 48061, which underlie the Westcott-Hort Greek New Testament of 1881 have been somewhat discredited by textual critics of the 20th century. It must be replaced by a new translation from texts that they considered to be older and better. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. (weak textual evidence). There are about 93 differences between the Stephanus 1550 and the Beza 1598. When Was It Written? The items have taken years to produce at enormous expense in time and money, and we use the income from sales to help fund the ministry. Sharing Policy: Westcott and Hort did what was unthinkable..they picked through five Greek texts which did not agree with each other, and came up with a new revised Greek version of the Bible. The KJV, on the other hand, is based upon the Majority text, over 5000 witnesses agreeing. If Westcott and Hort were the only textual scholars to endorse, defend, recommend, validate their critical text, we might be more critical of them and theyre younger days; however, their work has been reviewed or about 140 years now and literally hundreds upon hundreds of textual and translation scholars have adopted their scholarship, their work, and their product as the foundation for their translation: NIV, TEV, NASB, CEV, NLT, ESV, CSB, UASV, HCSB, and on and on. [4] (Greenlee, Introduction to New Testament Textual Criticism 1995, 76-7). Westcott & Hort's The New Testament in the Original Greek, 2009 Literal Translation of the Original Greek New Testament, Greek-English Interlinear with Strong's Concordance Numbering System, Color-Coded, Exhaustive Lexical Number Map with Grammatical Notes, Dr. Strong's Original Greek Dictionary & Abridged Thayer's Greek Lexicon, All Text Carefully Proofread and Coded into Quick-Loading, Simple HTML. They sought out contact with the spiritual world (talking with the dead, etc.). Westcott and Hort believed the Greek text which underlies the KJV was perverse and corrupt. Before delving into whether Westcott and Hort were Occultists or unbelievers, let us look at their work first. This should help the reader to see how desperate and weak their arguments are. (1993). There have been thousands of manuscripts discovered since 1611, and we now have 5,898 Greek NT manuscripts and numerous ones dating within decades of the originals. [1] Philip Comfort,Encountering the Manuscripts: An Introduction to New Testament Paleography& Textual Criticism, (Nashville, 2005), p. 100. As was stated earlier, Lucian produced the Syrian text, renamed the Byzantine text. An extensive comparison of the TR against the WH text, the Nestles Text, the UBS text, and key English versions was done by the late Everett Fowler and can be found in his book Evaluating Versions of the New Testament, available from Bible for Today. Brooke Foss Westcott (1825-1901) and Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828-1892) are mentioned regularly in relation to the Greek text of the NT. This is consistent with Riplingers claim; however, it had no bearing on his ability or skills as a textual scholar to produce and publish The New Testament in the Original Greek, a Greek-language version of the New Testament, which, again, published in 1881. But, except for three or four editors who timidly corrected some of the more blatant errors of the Textus Receptus, this debased form of the New Testament text was reprinted in edition after edition. The word MANUSCRIPTS is used to describe these copies or parchments which still exist. Heresies and blasphemies of Wescott & Hort - Jesus -is-Lord.com However, there is a problem, there was no Byzantine text for the first four centuries, and the Byzantine text did not become the majority of the manuscripts until the 9th century. [8] What was the inerrant word of God in the second and third centuries AD before the development of the Byzantine text? Restored Greek syntax. By the same token, most have rid themselves of the ancient King James Version and upgraded for a newer model, such as the NIV, or NASB, etc. What Can We Do to Establish Faith In the Restored Text of the New Testament? But we must remember that Bibles are translated by men, and thus corruption is possible. (No available presumptions whatever as to text can be obtained from number alone, that is, from number not as yet interpreted by descent.) (2.44). Archaeologists Discover 2,000-year-old Gemstone With balm Of Gilead Engraved On It, Masoretic Text, Westcott and Hort 1881 and Tregelles 1857. 50+ premium resources (>$2,400 value!). What is the Textus Receptus? | GotQuestions.org The material is copyrighted and should not be reprinted under any other name or author. They will leave discussions with us knowing we will not face up to the facts available in the manuscripts. [8], Westcott and Hort worked on their Testament from 1853 until its completion in 1881. The conclusion is obvious. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. The New Testament in the Original Greek is a Greek-language version of the New Testament published in 1881. Westcott and Hort, in turn, were rationalists in their approach to the textual problem in the New Testament and employed techniques within which rationalism and every other kind of bias are free to operate. John Tancock December 12, 2015. We have nothing to fear from new manuscript discoveries and the advancement of linguistic knowledge. Masoretic Text, Greek New Testament of Erasmus, the Vulgate, and theLuther Bible. Brooke Foss Westcott (1825-1901), and Fenton J A Hort (1828-1892) were two renowned Anglican scholars at Cambridge University. This Byzantine text is not the textus receptus, as it is thought to be by some, it is not the basis for the KJV, it doesnt include 1 John 5:7 or the end of Mark, but it is established by many manuscripts.

How Does Jeremy Come Back To Life After Silas, United Airlines Interview Prep, Istio Ingress Gateway Https, Power Bi 100% Stacked Bar Chart Show Values, Articles W